|
 |
They’re not fighting over religion, are
they?
The terrorists have not been waving Bibles or rosaries as they
plant their bombs or shoot their victims. BUT to maintain that religion
is a cloak for a struggle over constitutional allegiance is to simplify
a complex and dynamic relationship. It also implies a narrow conception
of politics. In its broadest sense, politics embraces the ideologies
which dominate or criticise any society. It is a myth that ideas do not
profoundly influence actions. In suggesting that the world is indeed
ruled by ideas, Keynes pointed to the so-called 'practical' men who
believe themselves to be exempt from intellectual influences but who
are in reality 'the slaves of some defunct economist’. In Ulster, the
enslaved is to two defunct brands of Christianity.
"The Northern Ireland conflict is a religious conflict. Economic and
social considerations are also crucial, but it was the fact that the
competing populations in Ireland adhered and still adhere to competing
religious traditions which has given the conflict its enduring and
intractable quality" ‑ Steve Bruce: God Save Ulster, Oxford, 1986,
p249
To say that the Ulster Problem is not
about religion since people are not killing over theological doctrine
is to make at least three false assumptions:
· It assumes
that the Problem is only confined to those who do the killing. But if
the fighting is related to the disagreements and divisions in society,
as it surely is, then it has to be explained in terms of the issues
which divide the two communities. And doctrinal differences are bound
to be relevant because they determine the nature of these two
communities i.e. Protestants and Catholics.
"Politics in the North is not politics exploiting religion. That is far
too simple an explanation: it is one which trips readily off the tongue
of commentators who are used to a cultural style in which the
politically pragmatic is the normal way of conducting affairs and all
other considerations are put to its use. In the case of Northern
Ireland the relationship is much more complex. It is more a question of
religion inspiring politics titan of politics making use of religion.
It is a situation more akin to the first half of seventeenth ‑century
England than to the last quarter of twentieth century
Britain" ‑ John Hickey: Religion and the Northern Ireland Problem, Gill
and Macmillan, 1984, p67)
· The reasons
for the killing offered by the participants and their supporters may
not be the true reasons. The fact that they are rarely expressed in
overtly religious terms does not render religion irrelevant. For we do
not have to accept their explanations of what they are doing. There may
be underlying causes of their actions which they fail to discern. The
IRA man who says he is killing for age‑old republican ideals is no
behaving in accordance with the republicanism of Wolfe Tone but instead
following a more modern myth of nationalism which is essentially
religious in character. It is a sacral nationalism descended from the
spiritual vision of Patrick Pearse and is essentially Catholic in
character. So, without being aware of it he has transferred his
Catholic beliefs and traditions into a political language.
· Above all, the
fallacy assumes that a religious war can only be waged over subtle
theological arguments. What is overlooked here is that these doctrinal
differences ‑ which are certainly real enough for those who think about
them ~ have also political, social, economic and cultural implications
which may deeply affect the whole community. In short, religion is not
merely a theology; it is also an ideology ‑ a whole way of life and
thought, whose concepts and assumptions are diffused throughout the
society of believers, informing their morals, customs, political
principles, social relations and attitudes to believers of differing
ideologies. It is in this sense more than any other that there is no
escape from the religious dimension of the Ulster Problem.
How is Religion politicised?
The Catholic strand of Christianity has been a strong and enduring
force in Ireland since the arrival of Christianity on the island in the
5th century AD. Paganism was destroyed much more easily than in Britain
‑ Ireland was the only country in Western Europe whose conversion
produced no martyrs. Another peculiarity of the early Irish church was
that the typical religious centre was the monastery rather than the
episcopal see. The monks and friars were poor, scholarly and
evangelical and these features were crucial in the survival of the
Catholic faith.
It is therefore not difficult to see why the Reformation failed in
Ireland. The general backwardness of the lay people and the absence of
a university meant that there was no critical atmosphere in the 16th
century to challenge the position of the Church. It in turn was not
rich enough to stir the anger of an Erasmus or a Luther or to arouse
the jealousy of the nobles that was common elsewhere. Also, a nascent
national sentiment was being identified with the cause of Catholicism.
"The often uneasy, but remarkably durable, blending of
religion and nationalism, was an affair of Catholics" Conor Cruise
O'Brien: Ancestral Voices,, Poolbeg Press, 1994, p17
Nevertheless it remained basically a
Gaelic Catholic Church until the 19th century and the growth of modern
Irish nationalism. The Church played a prominent role in Daniel
O'Connell's Repeal movement, O'Connell himself admitting that to win
the people over it was necessary to have the priests on his side.
This union of nationalism and Catholicism caused Thomas Davis to warn
that "to mingle politics and religion in such a country is to blind men
to their common secular interests, to How does religion divide the
society? render political union impossible and national independence
hopeless". But Davis's warning went unheeded, for as the century
progressed, the Catholic clergy took leading parts in all aspects of
the nationalist movement, providing the spiritual unity and
organisational talent.
Modern Irish nationalism maintains this Catholic character. "Since
Parnell, there has been no Protestant leader of Irish nationalism, nor
has any Protestant, ever since, been admitted to the inner circles of
Irish nationalism"(Conor Cruise O’Brien: Ancestral Voices, p29).
Contemporary Irish republicanism is descended from this tradition and,
above all, from the ideology of Patrick Pearse. Pearse identified the
Irish nation with Jesus Christ. Ireland was a crucified nation which
would have its resurrection and redemption. He and his fellow
nationalists would re‑enact the sacrifice of Christ, and thus redeem
the nation as Christ redeemed the world. For the symbolism to be
complete, the national crucifixion and resurrection had to take place
at Easter. It is no coincidence that the seven signatories of the 1916
Proclamation were all Catholics, for the Easter Rising was the most
exalted expression of Irish Catholic nationalism. Arguably, little has
changed. The offensive of the Provisional IRA begun in 1971 is a
Catholic and nationalist offensive, "not only (as claimed) against a
British occupation but against a Protestant and unionist population in
Northern Ireland" (O’Brien, op. cit. p4). It is essentially an Irish
Catholic imperialist enterprise to force the Protestants of Northern
Ireland into a United Ireland.
"The ancient quarrel is, of course, about power, and about its economic
base as well as about its political manifestations. But such
clichés can hardly satisfy us. If we ask further what are the
ends for which the possession of power is coveted, we may perhaps come
closer to the truth about Ulster. In that small and beautiful region
different cultures have collided because each has a view of life which
it deems to be threatened by its opponents and power is the means by
which a particular view of life can be maintained against all rivals.
These views of life are founded upon religion because this is a region
where religion is still considered as a vital determinant of everything
important in the human condition. And religion is vital because there
have been in conflict three (latterly) two deeply conservative,
strongly opinionated communities each of whose Churches still expresses
what the members of these Churches believe to be the truth" F.S.L.
Lyons: Culture and Anarchy in Ireland, 1984, p144
The dominant strand of Protestantism is the Puritan outlook. The
settlers who came to Ulster from England and Scotland were seeking to
establish in Ulster a society which reflected their predominantly
Puritan values. One of these key values is a deep-seated hatred of the
Catholic religion. As time progressed, they sought to maintain the link
with a Protestant state rather than be subsumed into what they saw as a
Catholic theocracy. That, ultimately, is the basis of their resistance
to a United Ireland.
How does religion divide society
· The two
dominant brands of Christianity are reactionary and inflexible. They
are also utterly opposed and have refused to compromise with each
other. They regard disputes about the Bible, the role of the Church,
tradition, popes and priests, transubstantiation, sacraments and other
rituals as more important than the so‑called Christian ethic.
· Politics in
Northern Ireland is dogmatic, impassioned and uncompromising because
the brands of Christianity which provide meaning to the lives of most
people are themselves dogmatic, impassioned and uncompromising.
· The fruit of
this sectarian divide is a system of social apartheid. The majority of
Catholics and Protestants live in different areas, attend separate
schools and clubs, play separate games and worship in separate churches.
· The sectarian
division manifests itself in terrorism. The struggle between loyalism
and republicanism is in no small part a politicised expression of the
religious division in which the active participants are in reality
fighting a Holy War on behalf of their opposing religious ideologies.
They are the unwitting slaves of defunct theological ideas.
· The Troubles
of the last 25 years have put the Christian churches firmly to the
test. And they have failed for the same reasons that they have failed
for nearly 400 years. They have refused to examine and civilise the
nature of their own beliefs. They have persistently placed their own
power and influence above real and risky attempts to reconcile the
people. Above all, they have failed because in willfully pursuing their
own tribal deities and rituals they have made a mockery of the loving
ethic which is allegedly the basis of their faith. They can never save
Ulster because they heart the heart of its Problem. *
"If the characteristic mark of a healthy Christianity be to unite its
members by a bond of fraternity and love, then there is no country
where Christianity has more completely failed than Ireland” W.E.H.
Lecky
|